<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Agile SharePoint Development by 21apps - Latest Comments in SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://21apps.disqus.com/</link><description>Agile SharePoint Development covering all aspects from Scrum, Unit Testing, TDD, Continuos Build, Peformance tuning - in fact anything and everything to do with Agile SharePoint Development.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:08:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-19888757</link><description>Looking forward to Sharepoint 2010 I suppose that MOSS acessibility will be maintained much better. I hope It will be well-integrated with W3S standarts in the field of websphere development and web portals development.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Itransition</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671453</link><description>Andrew,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have now released ARF (&lt;a href="http://www.spworks.co.uk/arf/accessibility.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.spworks.co.uk/arf/accessibility.aspx&lt;/a&gt;), which makes creating accessible publishing sites much easier.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--Vince</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vince Rothwell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671452</link><description>Great article, but even after reading the comments I cannot reconcile your numbering with WCAG 1.0 Checkpoints!  For example WCAG (both the March 1999 and final versions) stop at 1.5, but you have 1.6 - 1.9!  (And that's only the most obvious disconnect.)  Can you please explain where your questions came from?  Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Access Curmudgeon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671451</link><description>Andrew Nice article. Helped me in understanding on how SharePoint 2007 can tackle Accessibility requirements for my clients (especially those public sector ones!). &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that URL for Microsoft Accessibility site for developers is broken. the latest one is &lt;a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/accessibility/default.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/accessibility/...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ta&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jag&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jag</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671450</link><description>Michael,&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It appears that the WCAG article has been updated and the reference numbers seemto have changed!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The links in the post have been updated to point to the one they refer to &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990324/%3C/br%3E%3Cbr%3E%3C/br%3E%3Cbr%3EFor" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-199903...&lt;/a&gt; the updated list see&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist.html&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Woodward</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671449</link><description>Andrew,&lt;br&gt;It seems that your list is inconsistent with the official WCAG list - am I missing something?&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671448</link><description>Thomas,&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Links to the source material should be in the article.  I assume you refer to the WCAG checklist which is  &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist.html%3C/br" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist.html...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Woodward</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671447</link><description>Hi Andrew&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting article. Do you have a link to the source of Microsofts list that you present here?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;kind regards&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thomas&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671446</link><description>ishai, the article is a summary of the document which covers the Priority 1 (Level "A" compliance) requirements of the WCAG 1.0 specification.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a alt="Use of tables for layout" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT-TECHS/#gl-table-markup" rel="nofollow"&gt;Section 5.3&lt;/a&gt; of the guide does allow for tables for layout, however it is also regarded as a Priority 2 requirement.  I need to follow up the article with a comparision to the Priority 2 (Level "AA") compliance.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully the article will help people understand how MOSS 2007 has improved, but also that it is not a silver bullet and still needs improvement.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Woodward</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671445</link><description>Good article (and similar to my old one on accessability in sps2003). What about using tables for layouts - you didn't mention it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ishai Sagi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SharePoint Accessibility - Is MOSS 2007 accessible?</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/#comment-6671444</link><description>Content and Code has launched two W1 accessible websites, &lt;a href="http://www.fifteen.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.fifteen.net&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.wise-woman.net/Pages/default.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wise-woman.net/Pages/default.aspx&lt;/a&gt;. These two websites show that you can create an attractive and accessible website using SharePoint 2007 whilst not loosing any functionality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RYAN</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:07:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>